SEN. MARK KIRK

Kirk: U.S. should launch missile strike at Syria

2013-08-26T16:30:00Z 2013-08-27T18:44:23Z Kirk: U.S. should launch missile strike at SyriaEd Tibbetts etibbetts@qctimes.com The Quad-City Times

Sen. Mark Kirk said Monday the United States should launch a cruise missile strike at the Syrian unit responsible for using chemical weapons on civilians there.

Kirk, R-Ill., who was in the Quad-Cities to meet with representatives and to visit the Rock Island Arsenal, said the gassing of civilians should be met with swift action.

"My hope is to find the military unit that possibly was involved and hit their headquarters to cause a direct price for gassing civilians," he said. "I think there needs to be consequences."

He likened a strike to the 1998 attack on Iraq, which was aimed at curbing its weapons of mass destruction.

Kirk rejected any extended U.S. military involvement in Syria, however. He said that he opposed any "boots on the ground" and that a Naval strike would prevent any exposure by U.S. air crews.

"A proportional response with cruise missiles would, I think, be a better way to go," he said.

Kirk said the strike would embolden the rebels, and he expressed his belief Syria's leader, Bashar Assad, would be deposed.

"He's probably going to go the way of (Moammar) Gadhafi," the Libyan leader who was deposed and killed, Kirk said.

The pressure on the Obama administration to retaliate for the chemical strike has been building. On Monday, Secretary of State John Kerry said the evidence of chemical weapons use was "undeniable" and a "moral obscenity."

Kirk has been an intelligence officer in the Naval Reserve since 1989. He was in the Quad-Cities on Monday for the first time since suffering a stroke last year.

He met privately with local employers, visited Lock and Dam 15, then toured the Joint Manufacturing and Technology Center at the Arsenal. He also met with reporters.

At the Arsenal, he was accompanied by Quad-Cities Chamber of Commerce CEO Tara Barney and East Moline Mayor John Thodos.

Kirk, who was in a wheelchair during the news conference, emphasized his support for a defense spending bill authored by U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., that assists the Arsenal, including $150 million for the military account that funds the JMTC, as well as other activities across the country.

Area officials also met with him about seeking help to boost public-private partnerships on the island.

While members of different parties, Kirk said he and Durbin are in step in supporting the Arsenal.

As for his first trip to the area since 2011, Kirk said he's been happy to spend August on the road.

"I've got 12 million bosses in the state," he said.

Copyright 2015 The Quad-City Times. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(12) Comments

  1. 4America
    Report Abuse
    4America - August 27, 2013 3:02 pm
    We (the politicians) call the Syrian leaders out for using chemical weapons on their own people. Yes, it is a cowardly act by cowardly people. But, if the Nitwits in D.C, ( and I don't care if they are Re PUKE licans or DUMB ocrats) how many people are our bombs or missiles going to kill. And like chemical weapons, they don't pick and chose who they are going to kill, or MAIM! Send our politicians over there instead, let them show their true colors -YELLOW.
  2. snowman05
    Report Abuse
    snowman05 - August 27, 2013 9:54 am
    I'm sure the protesters will be out when POTUS launches an attack. Lol
  3. snowman05
    Report Abuse
    snowman05 - August 27, 2013 9:52 am
    Obama couldn't lead chunky kids to an ice cream stand.

    You are a whack job. Enjoy your day
  4. snowman05
    Report Abuse
    snowman05 - August 27, 2013 9:50 am
    Long you are a blowhard. You use a media com poll as your proof? Very scientific.

    Msnbc is just a little more factual. How about we keep the drilling here more and more and not need the Middle East. Or dies the fresh prince of Saudi got more money for the dens to delay more drilling and pipe line again?

    If rather be uneducated as you seem to claim than a blatant moron.
  5. Betttaxpayer
    Report Abuse
    Betttaxpayer - August 27, 2013 8:50 am
    Simple-minded. In general I agree with your comments but be careful what you wish for. Bringing our men and women home means we'll have very little need for a large standing Army and therefore very little need to keep the Arsenal running at full capacity. Notice that the Senator and almost everyone else in the National Command structure are saying "no boots on the ground" in Syria or anyplace else for that matter. "No boots on the ground" means fewer items to repair at the JTMC, fewer rounds of ammunition to buy at the JMC and fewer bases to support by ASC. Peace is not kind to Arsenals.
  6. Simple-Minded
    Report Abuse
    Simple-Minded - August 27, 2013 8:17 am
    You make good points. People may take you more serious if you can control rants and swearing. By calling Republicans uneducated, you make one assume that you are educated. Then it should be no problem for you to act like it.
  7. Simple-Minded
    Report Abuse
    Simple-Minded - August 27, 2013 8:14 am
    We need to roll-up the gate on the United States, and bring our men and women home. None of our business. Let God punish them that that violate His laws. We are a Country that came here to mind our own business and focus on our ideals and beliefs. We did not come to America to control the World. Republican of Democrat has nothing to do with it. We are all Americans. Reinstate the Pledge of Allegiance, read your Bible, and greet your neighbor. The rest will unfold as it may. There is zero faith in God today.
  8. PainfullTruth
    Report Abuse
    PainfullTruth - August 27, 2013 8:09 am
    @littlejohn,

    Let's look at some facts. You know, the truth, something that you seem to have little knowledge about....

    World War I - 1914-1918 - Woodrow Wilson (Democrat)
    World War II - 1939-1945 - Franklin Roosevelt and Harry S Truman (Democrats)
    Korean War - 1950-1953 - Dwight Eisenhower (Republican)
    Vietnam War - 1960-1975 - Dwight Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, and Richard Nixon (Rep, Dem, Dem, Rep)
    Persian Gulf War - 1990-1991 - George H. W. Bush (Rep)
    Second Persian Gulf War - 2003-2010 - George W. Bush and Barack Obama (Rep & Dem)

    Yes you are SO right. The nasty Republicans are the war mongers. Look at the list and tell me how many "D's" you can count. Use both hands if that helps. The bombs that were dropped to end WWII was by a Democrat.....

    So if Republicans aren't qualified to make this decision then a Democrat is? Based on what? John Kerry? The guy who can't make up his mind on how he voted?

    The Iraq debacle has not ended yet. Unlike what Obama promised, we still have troops in Iraq. We also have Gitmo still open, contrary to another Obama promise. We also have boots on the ground in Syria, another lie by your messiah.

    I'm still waiting to see your proof on your claims made earlier. Unlike you I provide facts (see above) and back them up with an educated response. You have been front and center with name calling, sexual references and lies.

    Just to remind you of another fact. You do realize that Bush went to Congress and got their approval to go into Iraq. Something that Obama hasn't done. The US doesn't need U.N approval to protect themselves. Ask Libya how the UN is helping them.

    Go ahead with more of your name calling. Next time provide some facts to back up your hatred. #still_laughing
  9. PainfullTruth
    Report Abuse
    PainfullTruth - August 27, 2013 6:47 am
    @longjohn,

    Check out the Washington Post. They are reporting "After Syria chemical allegations, Obama considering limited military strike".

    So.... Do you still support your "anti military" stance now that your messiah is thinking about doing it? I'm sure since it is a Democrat doing it you are okay with it, right?
  10. PainfullTruth
    Report Abuse
    PainfullTruth - August 27, 2013 6:24 am
    This coming from the party of "I voted against it before I voted for it" and "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky" or "What difference does it matter anyway". I guess when you have Democrats showing photos of their anatomy then YOU would know the average size of their package. It does concern me that you are interested in that sort of thing though.

    Thanks for the laugh!

    I love how you post "most republicans". Where is your proof (show actual numbers) on your calculation of "most". That would imply that more were against than for. So jump back on the short bus and attend third grade and show your homework....

    We are waiting......
  11. KAQ
    Report Abuse
    KAQ - August 27, 2013 3:41 am
    Send them aid if need be but why in the should we sacrifice any more of our sons and daughters? Once we have these countries talk about how much they hate us.

    They want our money and help then we're trash in their eyes.
  12. longjohn412
    Report Abuse
    longjohn412 - August 27, 2013 12:59 am
    MediaCom Poll

    Should the US intervene in Syria's civil war?

    Unsure - 8%

    Yes - 12%

    NO - 80%

    There is your answer War Monger Republicans ...,..
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Quad-City Times

Activate subscription button gif

Local Businesses