A survey of Davenport residents that was done this month and paid for by a group of area business leaders showed 92 percent of the population in favor of putting the city’s proposed purchase of the Rhythm City Casino to a vote.

But how that referendum would turn out is uncertain, according to the survey, with respondents roughly split down the middle on that question.

An alderman interviewed late Saturday said a referendum is not likely to happen.

The survey, performed by Personal Marketing Research of Davenport, shows there is still much confusion among the city’s residents on the issue.

Trish Duffy, the president of Personal Marketing Research, said 403 people were surveyed and that there is a 3.9 percent margin of error in the results. The study was broken down by ZIP Code, renter or property owner, and age.

“It’s really split,” she said. “There isn’t an overwhelming majority one way or the other. And 14 percent just don’t know.”

Many respondents, she said, told those taking the survey that they need more information.

Residents in the certain ZIP Codes such as 52801 and 52803 are in favor of the casino deal, as are most renters, she said.

“There is a core group that doesn’t want any gambling,” she said. “The rest of the negatives think the city should not be involved in the casino business.”

One of the business owners who helped pay for the survey is Mike Duffy, who is the president of Per Mar Security, with headquarters in Davenport, and who is Trish Duffy’s brother.

“There are about six or seven of us that together pay about $1 million a year in property taxes who paid for the survey,” he said. “We felt we had a dog in the fight.”

Duffy said he and those who paid for the survey are opposed to the city owning or operating a casino.

“That has more to do with our belief in capitalism and the free enterprise system,” he added.

Duffy said he is concerned that the city is getting into a business where it does not belong and is putting the taxpayers’ money at risk.

An example of that, he said, is Prairie Meadows in Altoona, Iowa, which opened in 1989 as a horse racing track, he said.

The Polk County facility “was a $40 million fiasco from day one,” he said. “It was only saved after the state legislature allowed them to have the horse track with the casino.”

In his mind, Duffy said, there is too much risk versus too little reward for the taxpayers of Davenport.

“I don’t think there is a reward,” he said. “If it is such a good deal, leave it to private enterprise.”

Don Decker, the treasurer of the Riverboat Development Authority, the nonprofit agency that holds the gambling license for the Rhythm City and a commercial property owner in Davenport, said he does not support Davenport owning or operating a casino at all and is concerned about how fast the purchase effort is advancing.

“I don’t think the city knows what it’s doing with this thing,” he said, adding, “The Rhythm City is in horrible shape.”

Davenport Alderman Bill Boom, 3rd Ward, said the city could take the issue to a referendum, but that is not probable.

The aldermen were elected to make decisions for their constituents, he pointed out.

“We made the decision to build the Westside Diversion Tunnel and nobody fussed about that,” he said.

Under the agreement plan, Boom said the city would not own the casino. The RDA would continue to own the gambling license according to the state code.

“What the city is doing is buying the business,” he said. “We’re not going to be running the casino. There will be a professional staff run by the DCIC, the Davenport Community Improvement Corporation.

“In my estimation, we should not be focusing on if the city should own a casino but on the issue that the city will be retaining $10 million a year (in casino revenue) that was going to go out of the city that we can use to assist us in doing infrastructure projects,” Boom said. “That’s the discussion we should be having.”

There is also the potential for lowering taxes and fees while at the same time providing improved services, he said.

“That’s the goal of many of us. We’re working on the city of the future.”

Last week, a casino consultant working for the city said that financial projections data used by Decker and another vocal opponent of the casino acquisition were miscalculated when they showed a deficit for the casino after three years.

The city intends to have the purchase on the March 7 meeting agenda of the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission, but the deadline to add such an item is Feb. 21. And there is a Jan. 25 deadline for talks between the RDA and the city on an operating agreement. An extension until March 1 is being sought from the Isle of Capri, which owns the Rhythm City.     

(10) comments

Mia's Mom

The Davenport City Council is afraid to put this to a referendum. The casino vote would fail much like the Davenport Promise did.


Do you think this "survey" reflects the outcome that those who paid for it wanted?


The article states..."Under the agreement plan, Boom said the city would not own the casino".....Really?

Next paragraph Alderman Boom says...“What the city is doing is buying the business,” ....huh? So if the casino, which (per Alderman Boom) the citizens will not own should fail, then the business that the citizens own (per Alderman Boom) would continue to thrive and the citizens would re-coop all of their $46M?

So which is it? Are the citizens of Davenport going to end up owning a casino, with all the risks associated with ownership or not?

And I agree with JS824, comparing an infrastructure need like a sewer line to borrowing to buy a business like a casino is just plain wrong.


Been living under a rock? The casino building will be developed and owned by one of the three developers who made proposals. The city has been clear that they would hire a professional, experienced gaming company to operate the casino. The RDA owns the license. That's the law. And has been explained more than once, at least two of the proposals offer to pay the city's debt for the license fee. I know it's complicated but pay attention and perhaps read the actual articles.


oh, it's not just about the city running the casino, what about the small businesses located where they want to build it? they will go under. the casino has food and liquer. the patrons wont come to the small businesses. Mayor, you and your minions are killing this town.

Arc Angel

This is not a democracy its Davenport.


“We made the decision to build the Westside Diversion Tunnel and nobody fussed about that,” he said. So you're comparing a necessary infrastructure improvement to you buying a casino? You are some of the most incompetent, arrogant, bunch of clowns I have ever seen.


In most states this would be called a dicator ship but not in iowa where it is common practice.


It's not hard to spend someone else money.


It isn't about what the citizens of Davenport want. It never has been and never will be. They have shoved this plan down the throats of the taxpayers without their support or consent. If this is such a great idea, then let the citizens of Davenport vote on it. After all it is THEIR $46 +/- a few million dollars that is being spent....

Comrade Malin, what do you have to fear?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.