Send us a letter

Commentary from readers is the heart of our editorial pages. Send your letter of up to 250 words to Please include your full name, address and phone number. All published letters include the writer's name and town of residence. We do not publish address or phone number, but require both for verification. Questions? Email Editorial Page Editor Mark Ridolfi or call him directly at (563) 383-2320.

Sequestration hurts military readiness

2013-07-17T01:00:00Z 2013-11-04T16:10:29Z Sequestration hurts military readinessScott Curtis The Quad-City Times
July 17, 2013 1:00 am  • 

Sequestration – a fancy term for a “meat-axe” approach to budget cuts — is not a smart solution to reduce our nation’s debt. Sequestration may be a victory for the tea party, but it isn’t a victory for the men and women of our military and their families.

In 2011 Congress could not agree on a budget deficit plan, so instead they passed a law saying if they couldn’t compromise, about $1 trillion in automatic, across the board cuts would take effect. Known as sequestration, Congress essentially “kicked the can down the road.”

At the time, sequestration was thought to be so preposterous Congress was effectively forcing themselves to fix the problem before it “kicked in.” They never did, and the furloughed workers on the Rock Island Arsenal are a small sample of the idiocy.

What many don’t realize is the process begins again in October. Military leaders are hog-tied, as they are unable to manipulate their own budgets to make up for the lost payroll dollars. As the Quad-City Times stated, no business could survive such a mindless approach to budget control.

Unfortunately, this Congress is unlikely to compromise. The hard-working men and women of the Rock Island Arsenal are being used as pawns in an ugly match, which will only damage our military readiness and restrict our ability to respond when the next crisis erupts.

In the long run the sequestration will hurt taxpayers because maintaining our military readiness today is far less expensive than rebuilding our military readiness tomorrow.

Scott Curtis


Copyright 2015 The Quad-City Times. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(2) Comments

  1. zetar
    Report Abuse
    zetar - July 18, 2013 5:07 pm
    Why do I even bother responding to Klaatu:

    "The United States spends far more than any other country on defense and security. Since 2001, the base defense budget has soared from $287 billion to $530 billion — and that’s before accounting for the primary costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars."

    I don't agree with it, but, yeah Obama has GREATLY increased Defense spending.

    We spend more on the defense than the next five countries PUT TOGETHER.
  2. Klaatu
    Report Abuse
    Klaatu - July 17, 2013 11:15 pm
    Wake up and smell the coffee. Obama is slashing the military budget irrespective and above and beyond the sequestration cuts. We are broke and lots of things are going to disappear. Not welfare for illegals or anything like that. Just basic defense and stuff like that.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Featured Ads

View All Featured Ads