Madigan seeks new hearing on concealed carry gun law

2013-01-09T04:54:00Z 2013-01-09T10:07:37Z Madigan seeks new hearing on concealed carry gun lawThe Associated Press The Associated Press
January 09, 2013 4:54 am  • 

CHICAGO — Illinois’ attorney general on Tuesday asked the entire 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to review a lawsuit challenging the state’s ban on concealed carry in an effort to salvage the only law in the nation that makes the practice entirely illegal.

Last month, a three-judge panel struck down the Illinois ban as unconstitutional and gave lawmakers 180 days to write a law legalizing it. But Attorney General Lisa Madigan is asking that all 10 judges on the court rehear the case, saying the previous decision “goes beyond what the U.S. Supreme Court has held” and conflicts with decisions by two other federal appellate courts.

The judges suggested in a 2-1 decision that legalizing concealed carry is long overdue. Judge Richard Posner, who wrote the majority opinion, said that there was nothing to suggest that criminal activity in Illinois was different enough from that in other states to justify taking a different approach to concealed carry.

Richard Pearson, executive director of the Illinois State Rifle Association, said he was “OK” with Madigan’s decision.

“That just puts (the issue) back in play,” Pearson said. “If we get a favorable ruling, we’ll be happy and if we get an unfavorable ruling, we’ll be on to the Supreme Court.”

Pearson and other gun-rights advocates have long argued that the prohibition violates the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment and what they see as Americans’ right to carry guns for self-defense.

Madigan’s request does not affect the court-ordered 180-day timeline to write a new law.

The appellate panel’s ruling argued that Illinois had not made a strong case that a gun ban was vital to public safety. It also said the Supreme Court already decided that the Second Amendment “confers a right to bear arms for self-defense, which is as important outside the home as inside.”

The dissenting judge, Ann Claire Williams, said that firearms carried outside the home increased the risk of death or injury to a broader range of people.

Gun rights advocates had been threatening to make Illinois once again the center of the national gun-control debate over the issue. In 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court made Chicago’s 28-year-old handgun ban unenforceable, ruling that Americans have the right to have guns in their homes for protection. The city responded by approving alternative methods of restricting who can have guns.

Last month’s ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by a former corrections officer, Michael Moore of Champaign; a farmer, Charles Hooks of Percy in southeastern Illinois and the Bellevue, Wash.-based Second Amendment Foundation

Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(4) Comments

  1. JMHO
    Report Abuse
    JMHO - January 09, 2013 10:16 am
    Gotta love these Chicago politicians with their two faced ways. It's OK for them to have body guards carrying concealed weapons to protect THEM, but they want to deny YOU the ability to defend yourself and your loved ones. Not to mention, they are trying to deny your rights under the 2nd Amendment. Nothing short of traitors, in my opinion.
  2. senor citizen
    Report Abuse
    senor citizen - January 09, 2013 9:01 am
    Chicago don't need no stikin' gun laws. Just keep building more public housing and the gangstas will shoot 'em to pieces. The people up there are failures and they elect their own to public office.
  3. Klaatu
    Report Abuse
    Klaatu - January 09, 2013 8:27 am
    They always seek to take advantage of a crisis. Use it to expand government authority. These democrats are no different than Stalin or any other left wing dictator. They are doing the same things exactly. Stalin didn't start out with detention camps. The Russian revolution was fueled by class warfare. The same promises, take from the rich, give to the poor. Just look at how that worked out.
  4. Contemptio
    Report Abuse
    Contemptio - January 09, 2013 6:36 am
    Time for Lisa and her father to go. Mike has been in the Illinois House since 1982 and Lisa has been riding his coat tails for years.

    Has Illinois really improved under their leadership?

    They are not the solution, they are the problem!
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow the Quad-City Times

Activate subscription button gif

Featured Ads

View All Featured Ads