Good thing it doesn't take a city to raise a museum

2001-08-02T00:00:00Z Good thing it doesn't take a city to raise a museumBarb Ickes/ QUAD-CITY TIMES The Quad-City Times
August 02, 2001 12:00 am  • 

Good thing it doesn't take a city to raise a museum

Everyone's a critic. Over the past week I've been asking readers what they think of the new plans and design for the Figge Arts Center.

It is safe to say that the new $30 million building is not a runaway hit. In fact, almost 50 percent of poll respondents said they would prefer the architect started over.

Others wrote e-mails to elaborate.

"What's with the big-block design, anyway?" asked Bettendorf reader Patrick McLaughlin. "Did the designer have only two different sized shoe boxes to work with?

"I can just envision some newcomers to the area taking a boat trip on the Mississippi and asking the tour guide, ‘Um, excuse me, but how many inmates does this new prison hold?'"

Others were unimpressed by the building's design for other reasons.

"I am not nuts about the new design of the art museum because it looks much too modern for the city of Davenport," wrote Davenport native-turned-Floridian Deanna Steinmann.

"There are so many lovely older homes and buildings that would not be complemented by this building."

There were plenty of other criticisms. Some people said the location is all wrong. Others described the building as uninspired and wondered whether it's going to get in the way of next spring's sandbag levee.

"With the river flooding in this site, whose idea was it to put it between Main and Harrison Streets?" a reader asked. "Does the city have all this money to repair it after every flood, or is it being built on pontoons?"

While I can appreciate sarcasm as much as the next girl, I am uncharacteristically open-minded on this one. I admit the first words out of my mouth were, "Where's the prescription drive-through?"

Second comment: "Will there be floating exhibits or a bridge over the moat?"

But Davenport Public Workstress Dee Bruemmer assures me the base floor of the new art center is well above the 100-year-flood stage. Plus, a flood wall for the lower-level parking garage should keep it mostly dry.

Some readers with more optimistic viewpoints also opened my mind.

East Moliner Bill Hannan (not the artist from Moline) put it this way:

"The selection of construction materials and the execution of the construction will, obviously, play a huge role in determining the ultimate success or failure of the building.

"But what we have to date n the schematic design n can be the basis of what may become the most important building in the city and one of the best in the region."

And this point was made by a Davenport reader:

"Why hire such a well-known architect if we're going to put so many restrictions on his design? If he's so good at what he does, let him do it."

We should also note that the architect has not shown us what the finished product will look like n only what the beginning product could resemble. The building in the pictures we've been seeing is naked. Once it is properly attired, it could be a knockout.

I do reserve the right, however, to continue to criticize one tiny element of the design. I'm pretty committed to not liking the fact that only about a quarter of the river side of the building is window. I would think the architect would design the thing with gigantic views.

Bruemmer said I'm getting way ahead of myself. She said the galleries need top lighting, but there will still be plenty river views from inside the museum.

Won't that be cool — seeing beautiful artwork on one side of you and the beautiful Mississippi River on the other?

The modern meets the current.

Barb Ickes can be contacted at (563) 383-2316 or bickes@qctimes.com.

Copyright 2015 The Quad-City Times. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

No Comments Posted.

Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick

Follow Hawkmania.com

Basketball schedule

2014-15 Hawkeyes (22-12, 12-6)

11/02/14 Northwood (Exh.) W 92-51
11/14/14 Hampton W 90-56
11/17/14 ND State W 87-56
11/20/14 Texas # L 71-57
11/21/14 Syracuse # L 66-63
11/24/14 Pepperdine W 72-61
11/26/14 N. Illinois W 70-49
11/29/14 Longwood W 77-44
12/03/14 at N. Carolina W 60-55
12/06/14 Md. Baltimore Co. W 77-47
12/09/14 Alcorn State W 67-44
12/12/14 Iowa State L 90-75
12/20/14 N. Iowa* L 56-44
12/22/14 N. Florida W 80-70
12/30/14 at Ohio State W 71-65
01/05/15 Nebraska W 70-59
01/08/15 Michigan St. L 75-61
01/13/15 at Minnesota W 77-75
01/17/15 Ohio State W 76-67
01/20/15 at Wisconsin L 82-50
01/24/15 at Purdue L 67-63
01/31/15 Wisconsin L 74-63
02/05/15 at Michigan W 72-54
02/08/15 Maryland W 71-55
02/12/15 Minnesota L 64-59
02/15/15 at Northwestern L 66-61
02/19/15 Rutgers W 81-47
02/22/15 at Nebraska W 74-46
02/25/15 Illinois W 68-60
02/28/15 at Penn State W 81-77
03/03/15 at Indiana W 77-63
03/07/15 Northwestern W 69-52
03/12/15 Penn State (BTT) L 67-58
03/20/15 Davidson (NCAA) W 83-52
03/22/15 Gonzaga (NCAA) L 87-68
#-New York *-Des Moines  


2015 Big Ten tourney

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

G1: No. 13 Penn State 68, No. 12 Nebraska 65

G2: No. 11 Minnesota 80, No. 14 Rutgers 68

Thursday, March 12, 2015

G3: No. 9 Michigan 73, No. 8 Illinois 55

G4: Penn State 67, No. 5 Iowa 58

G5: No. 7 Indiana 71, No. 10 Northwestern 56

G6: No. 6 Ohio State 79, Minnesota 73

Friday, March 13, 2015

G7: No. 1 Wisconsin 71, Michigan 60

G8: No. 4 Purdue 64, Penn State 59

G9: No. 2 Maryland 75, Indiana 69

G10: No. 3 Michigan State 76, Ohio State 67

Saturday, March 14, 2015

G11: Wisconsin 71, Purdue 51

G12: Michigan State 62, Maryland 58

Sunday, March 15, 2015

Final: Wisconsin 80, Michigan State 69 (OT)

Full bracket, seeds and matchup details

Standings

Blogs



Basketball titles, tournaments

Big Ten regular season champions
1923, 1926, 1945, 1955, 1956, 1968, 1970, 1979
Big Ten Tournament champions
2001, 2006

NCAA Tournament Final Four
1955, 1956, 1980
NCAA Tournament Elite Eight
1955, 1956, 1980, 1987
NCAA Tournament Sweet Sixteen
1955, 1956, 1980, 1983, 1987, 1988, 1999
NCAA Tournament appearances
1955, 1956, 1970, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1996, 1997, 1999, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2014, 2015

NIT appearances
1995, 1998, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2012, 2013


Basketball records since 2000

2014-15: 22-12, 12-6 Big Ten
2013-14: 20-13, 9-9 Big Ten
2012-13: 25-13, 9-9 Big Ten
2011-12: 18-17, 8-10 Big Ten
2010-11: 11-20, 4-14 Big Ten
2009-10: 10-22, 4-14 Big Ten
2008-09: 15-16, 5-13 Big Ten
2007-08: 13-19, 6-12 Big Ten
2006-07: 17-14, 9-7 Big Ten
2005-06: 25-9, 11-5 Big Ten
2004-05: 21-12, 7-9 Big Ten
2003-04: 16-13, 9-7 Big Ten
2002-03: 17-14, 7-9 Big Ten
2001-02: 19-16, 5-11 Big Ten
2000-01: 23-12, 7-9 Big Ten

Hawkeyes in NIT

1994-95

First round: Iowa 96, DePaul 87 (Moline, Ill.)

Second round: Iowa 66, Ohio 62 (Iowa City)

Quarterfinals: Penn State 67, Iowa 64 (Iowa City)

1997-98

First round: Georgia 100, Iowa 93 (Iowa City)

2001-02

First round: LSU 63, Iowa 61 (Iowa City)

2002-03

Opening round: Iowa 62, Valparaiso 60 (Iowa City)

First round: Iowa 54, Iowa State 53 (Ames)

Second round: Georgia Tech 79, Iowa 78 (Iowa City)

2003-04

First round: St. Louis 70, Iowa 69 (St. Charles, Mo.)

2011-12

First round: Iowa 84, Dayton 75 (Iowa City)

Second round: Oregon 108, Iowa 97 (Eugene)

2012-13

First round: Iowa 68, Indiana State 52 (Iowa City)

Second round: Iowa 75, Stony Brook 63 (Iowa City)

Quarterfinals: Iowa 75, Virginia 64 (Charlottesville)

Semifinals: Iowa 71, Maryland 60 (New York)

Championship: Baylor 74, Iowa 54 (New York)