Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Column: We need to reunite the country

Column: We need to reunite the country

  • Updated
{{featured_button_text}}
Richard Cherwitz

On July 4, 1776, the thirteen colonies claimed their independence from England, an event which eventually led to the formation of the United States and the Declaration of Independence. Each year on the 4th of July, also known as Independence Day, Americans celebrate our nation’s birth and heritage. It has become an occasion traditionally calling for political speeches and ceremonies celebrating the history, government, and traditions of the United States.

How sad it was, therefore, that President Trump on Friday chose to hijack a sacred national holiday to deliver a divisive and fear mongering speech targeted to his most ardent and zealous supporters. Rather than striking the type of unifying tone normally associated with July 4th oratory, Trump continued his rhetorical campaign to wage and stoke the flames of an alleged culture war—something totally at odds with the principles established at the founding of our nation in 1776.

Ironically, in the shadow of Mt. Rushmore, a monument to four of America’s greatest patriots, Trump disgracefully advanced a Joseph McCarthy-like “red herring” argument attacking his political foes (including institutions like the media, businesses and schools) for trying to erase history by removing monuments that are emblems of racial oppression. Worse yet, Trump ignored the Indigenous people of that land—something that constitutes yet another egregious insult to those forgotten Americans.

As has become Trump’s rhetorical modus operandi, all of this was done in an obvious effort to deflect attention from the real crises confronting the nation: the horrific economic and health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as a host of other problems the President has failed to address and that arguably he caused or at minimum exacerbated.

Trump’s dark message was explicit and unsubstantiated: "As we meet here tonight there is a growing danger that threatens every blessing our ancestors fought so hard for. Our nation is witnessing a merciless campaign to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values and indoctrinate our children." He asserted that there exists a "far-left fascism" which is the "very definition of totalitarianism."

In addition, the President falsely claimed: “Those who seek to erase our heritage want Americans to forget our pride and our great dignity, so that we can no longer understand ourselves or America's destiny. They would tear down the beliefs, culture and identity that have made America the most vibrant and tolerant society in the history of the Earth."

As a scholar of communication who has studied what Aristotle called “epideictic oratory,” one of the three branches of rhetoric, I was appalled by President Trump’s speech on Friday. Epideictic designates ritualistic speeches honoring and celebrating important moments in history. However, Trump made a calculated, limited and selfishly motivated political decision to launch his reelection campaign. While previous presidents more appropriately used this holiday as an opportunity to present a narrative bringing the country together, once again Trump sought the less noble path of dividing the nation by rallying and emboldening his most loyal supporters.

What made Trump’s speech insidious is that embedded in his unsupported harsh attacks were references to heroes a wider audience might find palatable—including Martin Luther King, Elvis Presley, Muhammed Ali, Louis Armstrong, among others. Moreover, in sharp contrast to previous rally speeches, the President aurally sounded sane; his speech was delivered with a cool, calm demeanor, lacking the usual silly talk and strange nonverbal gestures. In short, one could see Trump’s dark evil side attempting to present a message potentially appealing to a less extremist audience.

Regardless of our political views, we all should be saddened and disheartened by the President’s discourse—no doubt written by Stephen Miller. What especially is needed at this precarious time in America’s history is a president, like those carved into Mt. Rushmore, who is rhetorically capable of binding the nation’s wounds by appealing to the better angels of our nature.

Let us hope that by July 4th, 2021 we will have begun the journey to reunite the country.

Richard Cherwitz, Ph.D., grew up in Davenport and is the Ernest S. Sharpe Emeritus Centennial Professor at the Moody College of Communication at the University of Texas in Austin. He also is a founding director of the Intellectual Entrepreneurship Consortium at the university.

1
0
0
0
1

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

On November 3, 2020, Americans will elect our next president. Our choice seems to be to retain traditional capitalism with the Republicans, or turn the country over to a collection of old-line Democrats, worn-out socialists and modern Marxists.

I respectfully ask voters to cast a No vote against Thomas Kilbride in this election. Kilbride has already been a state Supreme Court judge for 20 years. He is seeking another 10 years, or 30 years total on the bench. Enough is enough.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News