Starting with an extensive list of candidates for general manager and head coach, the Chicago Bears are off in their parallel searches, sure to encounter some unique perspectives as they seek to make the right hires.
Two other teams — the Minnesota Vikings and New York Giants — also are conducting dual searches. Six teams have coaching vacancies, and if the Las Vegas Raiders’ position opens with special teams coordinator Rich Bisaccia currently the interim coach, that would make seven.
Chairman George McCaskey said the Bears are looking to hire a GM first, but if they meet the right coach and the fit seems perfect, he will not rule out making the hires in reverse order.
The Bears have had only two winning seasons in McCaskey’s 11-year run atop the franchise and opted for a housecleaning after a 6-11 season left them third in the NFC North. They fired Ryan Pace after seven years as GM, and coach Matt Nagy was dismissed after a four-year run and 34-33 record, including the postseason.
How attractive is the Bears’ coaching job? Quarterback Justin Fields is considered a young player with upside. Ownership has supported its football operation, recently pouring a ton of money into a renovation of Halas Hall. The Bears are considered an attractive home and have some young talent on the roster. The Tribune polled 19 league executives, coaches and veteran agents with knowledge of rosters and how teams operate, asking them to rank the seven openings.
“The one thing everyone focuses on is who is the quarterback,” said one GM who ranked the Bears No. 2. “That is the wrong approach, and it’s something I did. You never know what is going to happen, so focus on ownership and (whether they will) give you a chance to win."
Not everyone was as high on the Bears, who wound up sixth in the poll, although replies referencing ownership and the city were positive. Some leaned heavily on the quarterback on the roster. Others considered overall roster strength, the GM in place (if there is one), recent history, the division and other factors.
The poll assigned one point for the top-ranked team on every ballot, two points for the second team, etc.
1. Las Vegas Raiders (50 points)
The Raiders are the only team of the group in the playoffs, and owner Mark Davis could retain Bisaccia, but some believe they will have to win their wild-card-round game against the Cincinnati Bengals for him to be secure. Many cited quarterback Derek Carr as a major plus for the job. Some had questions about GM Mike Mayock.
“They need playmakers on defense and they really need help in the secondary, especially at cornerback,” one executive said. “They need some speed on offense, but Derek Carr is a good quarterback. That’s not a bad roster, even though I don’t think they’ve drafted real well under Mike Mayock. That job looks better if they get a GM I like.”
Added one veteran scout who put the Raiders atop his poll: “Established winning quarterback. Driven ownership, new stadium, fans.”
“It’s a playoff roster with Carr and pass rushers. That’s a plus when you’re walking in,” said a pro personnel director.
“No way,” texted one GM, who ranked the Raiders seventh.
2. Jacksonville Jaguars (55 points)
The Jaguars had the same number of first-place votes (five) as the Raiders but also got a few low rankings. Those who like the opening cited quarterback Trevor Lawrence, a wide-open salary cap and extra draft-pick capital. Some had pointed concerns about the presence of GM Trent Baalke.
“I wouldn’t pass up on the opportunity with the quarterback,” one executive said. “There’s low pressure from the fan and media base, but you need to have your own GM or personnel director there, which I think the owner would do. Overall, ( Shad Khan) has been patient with results and the process.”
Said one scout: “Very talent deficient on defense. They need a lot of help on that side of the ball and it’s not going to happen next year.”
“I think the owner will spend there to help you out,” a GM said.
“I’ve got them second but that’s only if they get a new general manager,” said one national scout.
“They’re the Jags,” said a veteran pro scout, who ranked them seventh.
3. Denver Broncos (60)
The Broncos arguably have the best roster of the bunch when not considering the quarterback, which is why they garnered four five-place votes. Those who mentioned GM George Paton talked positively about him. The team is expected to be up for sale, which creates an unknown.
“They don’t have a quarterback but they’ve got a lot of everything else — young and talented secondary, they’re OK on the offensive line and they’re loaded with talent at wide receiver and Javonte Williams is going to be a feature back in the NFL,” one scout said. “That team is primed to win, but they don’t have a quarterback and they’re going to have to make a major move. If they had a QB this year, Vic Fangio is still the coach and they are — at worst — a third or fourth seed in the AFC.”
“Who is the quarterback?” one veteran scout said. “Who is the owner. Great GM, great fan base, good young players overall.”
“Who is the next owner?” one GM said.
“What if they get Aaron Rodgers?” a pro personnel director said.
4. Minnesota Vikings (66)
The Vikings were in the middle of the pack on most replies and got six votes for No. 3. Like the Raiders, they have a veteran quarterback in Kirk Cousins, but he’s not as well-liked as Carr among pollsters.
“They have an elite receiver in Justin Jefferson, and while Kirk Cousins has a lower ceiling, he’s got a higher floor than a lot of quarterbacks out there,” one scout said. “I can work with that for a little while if I have to. I like Dalvin Cook, too, and there is some young talent on the offensive line. They need some young talent on defense.”
Added another veteran scout: “It’s a far better situation than the Jaguars. However, Cousins and his cap hit and the consistency situation is going to be hard to solve.”
“Cousins is looking, which is a negative, but there is some talent on the roster,” a pro personnel director said. “It’s a bigger rebuild than most probably think but the stadium and facility are top-notch and the owners aren’t afraid to pay for players.”
“The Wilfs are patient owners who provide everything you need to win,” a GM said.
5. Miami Dolphins (90)
The Dolphins surprised some by firing coach Brian Flores after three years. He has emerged as a candidate for the Bears. The Dolphins became the first team in NFL history to lose seven games in a row and win seven straight in the same season, so they have some pieces in place.
“There are some really nice players on defense at all three levels,” a scout said. “The offensive line needs to be upgraded, and they need some more skill position talent. They haven’t had a running back in a long time.”
“The reason I don’t have them higher is because of the quarterback,” said one scout who ranked the Dolphins sixth. “You have to build everything around Tua Tagovailoa. He can make plays underneath, but it’s hard to have a vertical element with him.”
“The owner is impulsive,” one national scout said.
Added a pro scout: “I’ve got them third by default. The GM is a huge piece there.”
6. Bears (92)
The Bears received six fourth-place votes and six sixth-place votes to fall just below the Dolphins. The Bears had only two votes above fourth — one first and one second. Fields was viewed as either a positive or a wild card, and the Bears were knocked for a lack of offensive pieces around the quarterback and offensive line.
“I like Justin Fields,” one scout said. “He has upside if he is coached right, and there are some pieces on defense. They need to address the offensive line and they severely lack offensive weapons. They’ve got to make a lot of moves on offense so Fields is in a better position to win.”
“It’s a developmental quarterback in Chicago,” one national scout said. “The city and fans make it attractive.”
“I’ve always looked at the Bears as a team that is pretty patient with the coach,” said one coach who ranked them fourth. “They could have fired the coach last year and didn’t. I like some of the young players, and if you can make it work with Fields, you might be winning pretty quickly there.”
Added a pro personnel director: “Top-10 defense with some pieces there. Fields is either going to be a plus or a minus. You can sort of ride him, and it’s not your fault if it doesn’t work out. That buys you some time if nothing else. The roster needs work, though.”
“From the outside, it looks like ownership has provided everything football operations could ask for, and that’s always a piece of the equation,” a college scouting director said. “It’s not that way everywhere.”
7. New York Giants (119)
The Giants got one fourth-place vote and three-fifth place votes and every other reply was lower with serious reservations about quarterback Daniel Jones, the overall roster, an unknown at the GM position and the revolving door of head coaches. Ten respondents ranked the Giants last.
“The quarterback at his best is a low-level starter,” one scout said. “They’ve made way too many expensive and bad signings in free agency. The offense is really bad, and they need help on defense.”
“I’d have questions for ownership,” a national scout said. “They’ve had three different coaches the last six years.”
Added a GM: “QB struggles, roster struggles, ownership struggles. Like Chicago, it’s a great place, but the media is tough, and you can work with a lot more and focus on just getting better in a place like Jacksonville.”
“Yeah, it’s a complete rebuild, but the Giants are blue blood in the NFL,” a pro personnel director said.
Said one assistant GM: “Void of talent.”
From George Halas to Matt Nagy: What was said about each Chicago Bears coach when they were hired
Heartley ‘Hunk’ Anderson/Luke Johnsos (co-coaches)
John ‘Paddy’ Driscoll